Australia's securities regulator has told the prediction markets industry it will not be granted a pathway to operate under financial services law, drawing an explicit equivalence between event contracts and gambling products.
Sarah Court, Chair of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, set out the position in a published blog post, writing that ASIC "is not currently convinced" that prediction market products fall outside the regulatory perimeter governing betting. The statement closes off an argument the industry has pursued in several jurisdictions — that event contracts are financial instruments and therefore a securities regulator's business, not a gambling authority's.
The ruling has direct relevance to the preemption fight playing out in US federal courts, where Kalshi's central argument rests on exactly that classification. A US federal court in Illinois has already sided with that framing. Australia's position points in the opposite direction, and gives ammunition to any regulator inclined to treat the question as settled in favour of gambling law.
Continue reading.
Second Circuit denies Kalshi and Coinbase emergency injunctions
Microsoft rejects multibillion-dollar AI deal with UK data centre firm Nscale
Arkansas Attorney General sues Kalshi and VGW gaming platform
Texas and Georgia attorneys general prepare state-level challenges to prediction markets
A few more worlds
worth exploring.
From the FreeMalta ecosystem.
The AI Journey
Explore AI beyond the headlines. Tools, ideas and a place to start.
Explore the journey 02 / THE GARAGEThe Garage
The companies behind the names. Explore their stories and the people building them.
Open the garage 03 / THE DUELThe Duel
Two contenders. A closer look. Put products side by side before choosing.
Choose your duel 04 / MALTAINSIDERMaltainsider
Discover the B2B side of Malta. A different lens on business and opportunity.
Meet Maltainsider