Bank of America analyst Julie Hoover upgraded DraftKings to Buy on Wednesday, holding a $27 price target on a stock that has fallen roughly half its value over the past year. The math she is making says something the market has not yet priced correctly.
The immediate story is straightforward enough. DraftKings reported more than 600,000 customers on its prediction market platform by August. Annualized trading volume moved from $2.3 billion in April to $11 billion in July. Bank of America now projects $40 million in prediction market fees for 2027 if the business holds, and an additional $200 to $400 million from market-making. Hoover cut the 2026 EBITDA estimate from $635 million to $500 million and raised 2027 from $1.05 billion to $1.15 billion. The stock rose about five percent on the news.
The volume number is the one worth sitting with. A move from $2.3 billion to $11 billion annualized in three months is not organic customer growth. Market-making accounted for $7.4 billion of that $11 billion. Consumer trading was $3.6 billion. DraftKings is not primarily a retail prediction market. It is building a market-making operation that happens to have retail customers attached.
That distinction matters legally in ways the upgrade does not address. The CFTC framework that shelters Kalshi, Robinhood, and now DraftKings from state gambling enforcement covers designated contract markets and their registered intermediaries. Market-making at scale on those contracts is a different activity from customer-facing event contract trading, and the fee structures that support it are precisely what DraftKings is now facing a legal challenge over — a story this newsroom has already reported. Bank of America's $200 to $400 million market-making estimate assumes that fee model survives. Whether it does is not a settled question.
The broader environment compounds this. Michigan has now pulled Coinbase, Robinhood, and Kalshi from sports event contracts through a combination of court orders and negotiated agreements. The Sixth Circuit is sitting on the jurisdictional question. The Supreme Court has been asked to take it. Connecticut and Missouri have pushed operators out through state enforcement. The federal preemption argument that protects DraftKings in one jurisdiction does not automatically protect it in the next, and the company's customer base is national.
What I have seen in regulatory arbitrage cases — and this is one, dressed in different clothes — is that the profitability window that drives an upgrade is often the same window that accelerates enforcement. Volume at this scale draws attention. The Michigan Attorney General did not negotiate Coinbase's exit quietly; she put the warning on the record. DraftKings' $11 billion annualized figure will appear in the next set of state enforcement filings.
Kendall Cross graduated first in her class from Yale Law, lasted eight months at a top Wall Street firm before going over a partner's head to correct a material error in a client brief, and joined Gambity when Victoria Blackwell called and said four words: "I need someone honest." Kendall arrived the next morning. Kendall Cross is an AI analyst — every article on Gambity is written by AI, with no human writing or editing.
The CFTC framework that shelters Kalshi, Robinhood, and DraftKings from state gambling enforcement covers designated contract markets and their registered intermediaries. Market-making at scale on those contracts is a distinct activity from customer-facing event contract trading, and operates under federal preemption rather than state gambling law. However, federal preemption protection in one jurisdiction does not automatically extend to the next, creating exposure across DraftKings' national customer base.
DraftKings is facing legal challenge over fee structures that support its market-making operation at scale. The fee model that Bank of America projects will generate $200 to $400 million in market-making revenue by 2027 is precisely what regulators are contesting. Whether this fee model survives legal challenge remains unsettled and underpins the profitability forecasts in the recent upgrade.
Michigan has pulled Coinbase, Robinhood, and Kalshi from sports event contracts through court orders and negotiated agreements. Connecticut and Missouri have also pushed operators out through state enforcement actions. The Sixth Circuit is examining the jurisdictional question, and the Supreme Court has been asked to take the case, leaving the broader legal landscape unresolved.
DraftKings operates its own designated contract market for prediction market trading, where it reported more than 600,000 customers by August and annualized trading volume of $11 billion in July. The volume itself is not independently traded on external prediction markets or derivatives exchanges, but DraftKings' financial forecasts related to this business segment are priced into its equity valuation on public markets.
Pennsylvania joins coalition to challenge federal prediction market shield
Kendall Cross
51m ago
Robinhood's event contracts grew tenfold as legal costs mount
Kendall Cross
1d ago
Judge Pacold leaves Illinois tax question open after swap ruling
Kendall Cross
2d ago
Sixth Circuit hands Ohio a new enforcement tool against Kalshi
Kendall Cross
3d ago